Infopedia:Criteria for speedy deletion

The criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus to bypass deletion discussion, at their discretion, and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media. Anyone can request speedy deletion by adding one of the speedy deletion templates, but only administrators may actually delete.

Because deletion is reversible only by administrators, other deletions occur only after discussion, unless they are proposed deletions. Speedy deletion is intended to reduce the time spent on deletion discussions for pages or media with no practical chance of surviving discussion.

Before nominating a page for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way (see ). A page is eligible for speedy deletion only if all of its history is also eligible. Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criterion/criteria the page meets, and should notify the page creator and any major contributors. If a page needs to be removed from Wikipedia for privacy reasons (e.g. non-public personal information, a child disclosing their age, possible libel), request oversight instead.

For most speedy deletion criteria, ; only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so. A creator who disagrees with the speedy deletion should instead click on the Contest this speedy deletion button that appears inside of the speedy deletion tag. This button links to the discussion page with a pre-formatted area for the creator to explain why the page should not be deleted. If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is controversial and another deletion process should be used. The creator of a page may remove a speedy deletion tag only if the criterion in question is G6, G7, G8, G13, G14, C1 or U1.

Administrators should take care not to speedily delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be speedily deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations and pages that meet specific uncontroversial criteria; these criteria are noted below. Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation.

Besides speedy deletion, there are the following methods of deletion:
 * Deletion discussions ( AfD, CfD, FfD, MfD, RfD, TfD ), the normal method of carrying out deletion.
 * Proposed deletions, for nominating articles and files for uncontroversial deletion.
 * Proposed deletion of biographies of living people, for articles on living persons without sources.

Introduction to criteria
Abbreviations (G12, A3...) are often used to refer to these criteria, and are given in each section. For example, "CSD G12" refers to criterion 12 under general (copyright infringement) and "CSD U1" refers to criterion 1 under user (user request). to new editors or anyone else unfamiliar with this page; in many situations a plain-English explanation of why a specific page was or should be deleted is preferable.

Immediately following each criterion below is a list of templates used to mark pages or media files for speedy deletion under the criterion being used. In order to alert administrators to the nomination, place the relevant speedy deletion template at the top of the page or media file you are nominating (but see below). Please be sure to supply an edit summary that mentions that the page is being nominated for speedy deletion. All of the speedy deletion templates are named as Db-X with Db standing for 'delete because'. A list of the Db-X templates can be found at Criteria for speedy deletion/Deletion templates.

If a page falls under more than one of the criteria, instead of adding multiple tags it is possible to add a single Db-multiple tag to cover them all. For example, if an article seems both to be blatantly promotional (G11) and also to fail to indicate significance of its subject (A7) then the tag can be used to indicate both of these concerns. The article can then be speedily deleted if an administrator assesses it and decides that either or both of the criteria apply.

There is strong consensus that the creators and major contributors of pages and media files should be warned of a speedy deletion nomination (or of the deletion if not informed before). All speedy deletion templates (using criteria other than U1, G5, G6, G7, and G8) thus contain in their body a pre-formatted, suggested warning template to notify the relevant party or parties of the nomination for speedy deletion under the criterion used. You can copy and paste such warnings to the talk pages of the creators and major contributors, choose from others listed at Category:CSD warning templates, or place the unified warning template,, which allows you to tailor your warning under any particular criterion by replacing  with the associated criterion abbreviation (e.g. g4, a7).

Use common sense when applying a speedy deletion request to a page: review the page history to make sure that all earlier revisions of the page meet the speedy deletion criterion, because a single editor can replace an article with material that appears to cause the page to meet one or more of the criteria.

Pages that need to be tagged in a special manner
Some pages either cannot or should not be tagged for speedy deletion in the normal manner:
 * Pages that you cannot edit (e.g., due to protection), or JSON pages: place the template on the corresponding Talk page instead, along with an explanation of which page to delete.
 * Template: pages: place the template within a noinclude tag, like this: 
 * Module: pages (except for /doc pages): place the template with Module:Module wikitext, like this:
 * CSS (including sanitized CSS) or JavaScript pages: place the template in a comment, like this:

Pages that have survived deletion discussions
When applicable, the following criteria may be used to delete pages that have survived their most recent deletion discussions: These criteria may only be used in such cases when no controversy exists; in the event of a dispute, start a new deletion discussion. However, newly discovered copyright violations should be tagged for G12 if the violation existed in all previous revisions of the article. G5 may be also used at discretion, subject to meeting the criterion outlined above.
 * G5, creation by banned or blocked users, subject to the strict condition that the XfD participants were unaware that the article would have met the criterion and/or that the article creator's blocked or banned status was not known to the participants of the XfD discussion.
 * G6, technical deletions, only if the deletion is temporary, or if no actual content will be removed
 * G8, pages dependent on nonexistent pages
 * G9, office actions
 * G12, unambiguous copyright violations
 * G13, stale drafts, if 6 months have passed since the deletion discussion and any subsequent human edits
 * F8, images on Commons, if the image did not exist on Commons at the time of the FfD
 * F9, unambiguous copyright infringement
 * U1, user requests deletion within their own userspace

General
These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed for specific criteria, and so apply to articles, drafts, redirects, user pages, talk pages, files, etc. Read the specifics for each criterion to see where and how they apply.

G1. Patent nonsense
This applies to pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It does cover poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism or hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material. In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply. Nor does it apply to user sandboxes or other pages in the user namespace.
 * Db-g1, Db-nonsense

G2. Test pages
This applies to pages created to test editing or other Wikipedia functions. It applies to subpages of the Wikipedia Sandbox created as tests, but does apply to the Sandbox itself, pages in the user namespace, or valid but unused or duplicate templates.
 * Db-g2, Db-test

G3. Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes
This applies to pages that are blatant and obvious misinformation, blatant hoaxes (including files intended to misinform), and redirects created by cleanup from page-move vandalism. Articles notable hoaxes are acceptable if it is clear that they are describing a hoax.
 * Db-g3, Db-vandalism – for vandalism
 * Db-hoax – for hoaxes

G4. Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion
This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. It excludes pages that are substantially identical to the deleted version, and pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies. It excludes pages in userspace and draftspace where the content was converted to a draft for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy). This criterion also does not cover content undeleted via a deletion review, or that was only deleted via proposed deletion (including deletion discussions closed as "soft delete") or speedy deletion.
 * Db-g4, Db-repost

G5. Creations by banned or blocked users
This applies to pages created by banned or blocked users, and that have no substantial edits by others.
 * To qualify, the edit or page must have been made while the user was actually banned or blocked. A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion.
 * For topic-banned editors, the page must be a violation of the user's specific ban, and does not include contributions legitimately about some other topic.
 * When a blocked or banned person uses an alternate account (sockpuppet) to avoid a restriction, any pages created via the sock account after the earliest block or ban of any of that person's accounts qualify for G5 (if not substantially edited by others); this is the most common case for applying G5.
 * G5 should not be applied to transcluded templates or populated categories unless they have been transcluded or populated entirely by the banned or blocked user; these edits need to be reverted before deletion.

Templates:

G6. Technical deletions
This is for uncontroversial maintenance, including: Templates:
 * Deleting empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
 * Deleting redirects or other pages blocking page moves. Administrators should be aware of the proper procedures where a redirect or page holding up a page move has a non-trivial page history. An administrator who deletes a page that is blocking a move should ensure that the move is completed after deleting it.
 * Deleting pages unambiguously created in error or in the incorrect namespace.
 * Deleting templates orphaned as the result of a consensus at Templates for discussion.
 * – If none of the special tags below applies, this tag should be used with a reason specified in the rationale parameter.
 * – for cut-and-paste page moves that need to be temporarily deleted to make room for a clean page move.
 * – for pages that are currently holding up a non-controversial or consensual page move.
 * – for pages that were holding up a page move, until they were moved out of the way by a page mover.
 * – for pages that are currently holding up a non-controversial or consensual page move as a result of an Articles for creation (AFC) review, typically for articles in draft space.
 * – for pages where a consensus to delete has been previously reached via deletion discussion, but which were not deleted.
 * Db-error – for pages obviously created in error.

G7. Author requests deletion
If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content of the page was added by its author. For redirects created as a result of a page move, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the pages before the move. If the sole author blanks a page other than a userspace page, a category page, or any type of talk page, this can be taken as a deletion request.
 * Db-g7, Db-author, Db-blanked, Db-self

G8. Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page
Examples include:
 * Talk pages with no corresponding subject page
 * Subpages with no parent page
 * File pages without a corresponding file
 * Redirects to targets that never existed or were deleted
 * Unused editnotices of non-existent or unsalted deleted pages
 * Categories populated by deleted or retargeted templates

This criterion excludes any page that is useful to Wikipedia, and in particular:
 * Deletion discussions that are not logged elsewhere
 * User talk pages
 * Talk page archives (except article talk page archives where the corresponding article and main talk page have been deleted and the page is not otherwise useful to Wikipedia – check for page-moves and merges before using G8 on article-talk-page-archives; the parent article might still exist under a different name)
 * Redirects that were broken as a result of a page move or retargeting (these should instead be retargeted to their target's new name), except where R2 speedy deletion would then immediately apply
 * Plausible redirects that can be changed to valid targets
 * User subpages
 * Talk pages for files that exist on Wikimedia Commons
 * Pages that should be moved to a different location

Exceptions may be sign-posted with the template G8-exempt.
 * Db-g8 – for cases not covered by any of the special tags below
 * Db-imagepage – for file description pages with no corresponding file
 * Db-redirnone – for pages that redirect to nonexistent/deleted pages, or pages currently flagged for speedy deletion
 * Db-subpage – for subpages of nonexistent/deleted pages, or pages currently flagged for speedy deletion
 * Db-talk – for talk pages of nonexistent/deleted pages, or pages currently flagged for speedy deletion
 * Db-templatecat – for categories populated by a deleted or retargeted template

G9. Office actions
In exceptional circumstances, the Wikimedia Foundation office reserves the right to speedy-delete a page. Deletions of this type must not be reversed without permission from the Foundation.

G10. Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose
Examples of "attack pages" may include: libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person, or biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced. These pages should be speedily deleted when there is no neutral version in the page history to revert to. Both the page title and page content may be taken into account in assessing an attack. Articles about living people deleted under this criterion should be restored or recreated by any editor until the biographical article standards are met. Other pages violating the Biographies of living persons policy might be eligible for deletion under the conditions stipulated at Biographies of living persons, although in most cases a deletion discussion should be initiated instead.

Redirects from plausible search terms are not eligible under this criterion. For example, a term used on the target page to refer to its subject is often a plausible redirect – see RNEUTRAL.
 * Db-g10, Db-attack, Db-attackorg, Db-personal attack
 * Db-negublp – for articles about living persons that are unsourced, entirely negative in tone, and have no neutral version to revert to

G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion
This applies to pages that are promotional and would need to be  rewritten to serve as encyclopedia articles, rather than advertisements. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. Note: Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. However, "promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.
 * Db-g11, Db-promo, Db-spam
 * Db-spamuser – for userpages used only for publicity and promotion, with a username that promotes or implies affiliation with the entity being promoted

G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement
This applies to text pages that contain copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a compatible free license, where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving. Only if the history is unsalvageably corrupted should it be deleted in its entirety; earlier versions without infringement should be retained. For equivocal cases that do not meet speedy deletion criteria (such as where there is a dubious assertion of permission, where free-content edits overlie the infringement, or where there is only partial infringement or close paraphrasing), the article or the appropriate section should be blanked with {{subst:Copyvio}}, and the page should be listed at Copyright problems. Please consult Copyright violations for other instructions. Public-domain and other free content, such as a Wikipedia mirror, do not fall under this criterion, nor is mere lack of attribution of such works a reason for speedy deletion. For images and media, see the equivalent criterion in the "Files" section here, which has more specific instructions.
 * Note: If other criteria apply in addition to G12, the template Db-multiple should be used instead, so we do not waste time seeking copyright permission after deleting the page.
 * Note: If other criteria apply in addition to G12, the template Db-multiple should be used instead, so we do not waste time seeking copyright permission after deleting the page.



G13. Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions
This applies to any pages that have not been edited by a human in six months found in: Redirects are exempt from G13 deletion. Adding a CSD template to a page does not reset the six-month clock, but removing a CSD template does. Pages deleted under G13 may be restored upon request by following the procedure at Requests for undeletion/G13.
 * 1) Draft namespace,
 * 2) Userspace with an AFC submission template
 * 3) Userspace with no content except the article wizard placeholder text.
 * Db-g13, Db-afc, db-blankdraft

G14. Unnecessary disambiguation pages
This applies to the following disambiguation pages: If a disambiguation page links to only one article and does not end in (disambiguation), it should be changed to a redirect, unless it is more appropriate to move the linked page to the title currently used for the disambiguation page. G14 also applies to pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
 * Disambiguation pages that have titles ending in "(disambiguation)" but disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page.
 * Regardless of title, disambiguation pages that disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages.
 * A redirect that ends in "(disambiguation)" but does not redirect to a disambiguation page or a page that performs a disambiguation-like function.
 * Db-g14, Db-disambig

Articles
These criteria apply only to pages in the article (main) namespace. They do not apply to redirects. For any articles that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Articles for deletion or Proposed deletion.

Not all numbers are used, as some criteria have been repealed.

A1. No context
This applies to articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." It applies only to very short articles. Note that context is different from content, treated in A3. This coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material. If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate. Do not tag under this criterion in the first few minutes after a new article is created.
 * Db-a1, Db-nocontext

A2. Foreign-language articles that exist on another Wikimedia project
This applies to articles not written in English that have essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia project. If the article is not the same as an article on another project, use the template instead, and list the page at Pages needing translation into English for review and possible translation.
 * Db-a2, Db-foreign

A3. No content
This applies to articles consisting only of external links, category tags or "See also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, questions that should have been asked at a noticeboard, chat-like comments, template tags, or images. This may also apply to articles consisting entirely of the framework of the Article wizard with no additional content, or no content at all. However, a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. Similarly, this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox, unless its contents also meet another speedy deletion criterion. This criterion poor writing, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material. Do not tag under this criterion in the first few minutes after a new article is created.
 * Db-a3, Db-nocontent, Db-contact
 * Db-empty – context-specific version: calls Db-c1 for categories, and Db-a3 everywhere else.

A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events)
This applies to any article about a that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant,. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion applies to articles about the listed subjects; in particular, it does  apply to articles about albums (these may be covered by CSD A9), products, books, films, TV programs, software, or other creative works, nor to entire  of animals. The criterion apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible, and any article with a blatantly false claim may be submitted for speedy deletion as a hoax instead. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion. The criterion does apply to any article that makes  even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
 * Db-a7
 * Db-person – for people
 * Db-band – for bands
 * Db-club – for clubs, societies and groups
 * Db-inc – for commercial and non-commercial organizations
 * Db-web – for websites
 * Db-animal – for individual animals
 * Db-event – for events

A9. No indication of importance (musical recordings)
This applies to any article about a or  where  and that  ( conditions must be met). This is distinct from questions of verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion does apply to other forms of creative media, products, or any other types of articles. The criterion does apply to any article that makes  even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
 * Db-a9, Db-album, Db-song, Db-discog

A10. Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic
This applies to any article with no relevant page history that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia article, and that  within any existing article(s) on the subject, and where the title is. This does include split pages or any article that expands or reorganizes an existing one or that contains referenced, mergeable material. It also does include disambiguation pages. The title chosen for the vast majority of duplicate articles will be a plausible misspelling of, or alternative name for, the existing article, and a redirect should be created instead of deletion. This criterion should, accordingly, only be used rarely, and only for pages where the title could be speedily deleted as a redirect.

 A11. Obviously invented
This applies to any article that plainly indicates that the subject was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone the creator personally knows, and does not credibly indicate why its subject is important or significant. The criterion does apply to any article that makes  even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify under Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Note: (see CSD G3).
 * Db-a11, Db-invented, Db-madeup

Redirects
These criteria apply to redirects, including soft redirects, in any namespace, with exclusions listed for specific criteria. For any redirects that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Redirects for discussion.

Not all numbers are used, as some criteria have been repealed.

R2. Cross-namespace redirects
This applies to redirects (apart from shortcuts) from the main namespace to any other namespace the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces, and to broken redirects that would qualify for this criterion if they were fixed (e.g., redirects to articles that have been draftified).
 * See also Cross-namespace redirects, Category:Cross-namespace redirects, and MOS:LINKSTYLE.


 * Db-r2, Db-rediruser

R3. Implausible typos
This applies to redirects from  typos or misnomers. However, redirects from common misspellings or misnomers are generally useful, as are sometimes redirects in other languages. This criterion does apply to redirects created as a result of a page move, unless the moved page was also recently created. It also does not apply to articles and stubs that have been converted into redirects, including redirects created by merges, or to redirects ending with "(disambiguation)" that point to a disambiguation page.
 * Db-r3, Db-redirtypo

R4. File namespace redirects with names that match Wikimedia Commons pages
This applies to redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons, provided the redirect on Wikipedia has no file links (unless the links are obviously intended for the file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons).
 * Db-r4, Db-redircom

Other issues with redirects
For redirects that end in "(disambiguation)", see G14.

For redirects that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Redirects for discussion.

Redirect pages that have useful page history should never be speedily deleted. In some cases it may be possible to make a useful redirect by changing the target instead of deleting it. Redirects that do not work because of software limitations, such as redirects to special pages or to pages on other wikis, may be converted to soft redirects if they have a non-trivial history or other valid uses.

For reversal of redirects, use, a special case of.

Files
Note: These criteria formerly began with I (e.g. I1, I6, I9) but have since been replaced with F, without the actual criteria being changed. This was because the file namespace was formerly known as the image namespace.

For any images and other media that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Proposed deletion or Files for discussion.

Not all numbers are used, as some criteria have been repealed.

F1. Redundant
This applies to unused duplicates or lower-quality/resolution copies of another Wikipedia file having the same file format. This excludes images in the Wikimedia Commons; for these, see criterion F8.

F2. Corrupt, missing or empty file
This applies to files that are corrupt, missing, empty, or that contain superfluous and blatant non-metadata information. This also includes file description pages for Commons files that do not include information that is specific to English Wikipedia (like ).
 * Db-f2, Db-nofile, Db-fpcfail

F3. Improper license
This criterion is used to flag media licensed as "for non-commercial use only" (including non-commercial Creative Commons licenses), "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only" or "used with permission". These may be deleted, unless they comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. Files licensed under versions of the GFDL earlier than 1.3, without allowing for later versions or other licenses, may be deleted.
 * Db-f3, Db-noncom

F4. Lack of licensing information
This applies to media files lacking the necessary licensing information to verify copyright status after being identified as such for. Administrators should check the upload summary, file information page, and the image itself for a source before deleting under this criterion.
 * – no source
 * – no license
 * – neither source nor license

F5. Orphaned non-free use images
This applies to images and other media that are not under a free license or in the public domain and that are not used in any. These may be deleted after being identified as such for more than or immediately if the image's  use was on a deleted article and it is  to have any use on any other valid article. This includes previous revisions of the image. Reasonable exceptions may be made for images uploaded for an upcoming article.
 * Db-f5 – for immediate F5 deletions
 * – for files
 * – for revisions only

F6. Missing non-free use rationale
This applies to non-free files claiming fair use but without a use rationale. These may be deleted after being identified as such for. The boilerplate copyright tags setting out fair use criteria do not constitute a rationale. This criterion does not apply to situations where a use rationale is provided but is disputed.

F7. Invalid fair-use claim
1. Non-free images or media from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is the subject of sourced commentary, are considered an invalid claim of fair use and fail the strict requirements of Non-free content criteria; and may be deleted.

2. Non-free images or media that have been identified as being replaceable by a free image and tagged with may be deleted after, if no justification is given for the claim of irreplaceability. If the replaceability is disputed, the nominator should not be the one deleting the image.

3. Invalid fair-use claims tagged with may be deleted after they are tagged, if a full and valid fair-use use rationale is not added. Templates:
 * Db-f7, Db-badfairuse – for immediate F7 deletions
 * – replaceable with free images
 * – disputed non-free use rationales

F8. Images available as identical copies on Wikimedia Commons
Provided the following conditions are met: Db-f8, Now Commons,
 * The Commons version is in the same file format and is of the same or higher quality/resolution.
 * The image's license and source status is beyond reasonable doubt, and the license is undoubtedly accepted at Commons.
 * Name and date of death of the creator of the artistic work represented by the file, or else clear evidence that a free license was given. If anonymous, ensure the page description provides evidence that establishes the anonymous status.
 * Country where the artistic work represented by the file was situated, or where it was first published.
 * Date when the artistic work represented by the file was created or first published, depending on the copyright law of the origin country.
 * All image revisions that meet the first condition have been transferred to Commons as revisions of the Commons copy and properly marked as such.
 * The image is not marked as or as.
 * All information on the image description page is present on the Commons image description page, including the complete upload history with links to the uploader's local user pages (the upload history is necessary if the file's license does not require it, although it is still recommended).
 * If there is any information not relevant to any other project on the image description page (like ), the image description page must be undeleted after the file deletion.
 * If the image is available on Commons under a different name than locally, all local references to the image must be updated to point to the title used at Commons.
 * The image is not protected., even if there is an identical copy on Commons, unless the image is no longer in use (check what links here). They are usually locally uploaded and protected here since they are used in the interface or in some widely used high-risk template. Deleting the local copy of an image used in the interface . More about high-risk images.
 * images may be speedily deleted as soon as they are off the Main Page.

F9. Unambiguous copyright infringement
This applies to obviously non-free images (or other media files) that are not claimed by the uploader to be fair use. A URL or other indication of where the image originated should be mentioned. This does not include images with a credible claim that the owner has released them under a Wikipedia-compatible free license. Most images from stock photo libraries such as Getty Images will not be released under such a license. Blatant infringements should be tagged with the template. Non-blatant copyright infringements should be discussed at Files for discussion.

F11. No evidence of permission
If an has specified a license and has named a third party as the source/copyright holder without providing evidence that this third party has in fact agreed, the item may be deleted  of the uploader. Acceptable evidence of licensing normally consists of either a link to the source website where the license is stated, or a statement by the copyright holder e-mailed or forwarded to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org]. Such a confirmation is also required if the source is an organization that the uploader claims to represent, or a web publication that the uploader claims to be their own. Instances of copyright violations where the uploader would have no reasonable expectation of obtaining permission (e.g. major studio movie posters, television images, album covers, logos that are  simple enough to be public domain, etc.) should be speedily deleted per reason F9 (unambiguous copyright infringement), unless fair-use can be claimed. Files tagged with Permission pending for more than 30 days may also be speedily deleted under this criterion. (Please note that the backlog for messages sent to the permissions-en queue is currently days. You may wish to wait at least this amount of time before tagging VRT pending images for deletion.) Images tagged Permission received whose permissions have not been confirmed after 30 days may be deleted immediately under this criterion, without waiting an additional seven days, provided a check of the ticket is performed by a VRT agent to confirm that no further interaction is ongoing.

Categories
For any category pages that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Categories for discussion.

Not all numbers are used, as some criteria have been repealed.

C1. Unpopulated categories
This criterion applies to categories that have been unpopulated for at least seven days. This does not apply to disambiguation categories, category redirects, featured topics categories, categories under discussion at Categories for discussion (or other such discussions), or project categories that by their nature may become empty on occasion (e.g. cleanup categories, or Category:Wikipedians looking for help). Place Possibly empty category (or, for administrative categories, Wikipedia category) at the top of the page to prevent such categories from being deleted.
 * Db-c1, db-catempty.

C2. Speedy renaming and merging
Assorted sub-criteria that are used only at WP:CFDS; please see that page for details and instructions.

User pages
These criteria apply only to pages in the User: and User talk: namespaces. For any user pages that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Miscellany for deletion.

Not all numbers are used, as some criteria have been repealed.

U1. User request
Personal user pages and subpages (but user talk pages) upon request by their user. This also includes editnotices for user pages. In some rare cases there may be administrative need to retain the page. User talk pages are not eligible for speedy deletion under this criterion. Pages which have previously been moved are only eligible if all previous titles were in the user's userspace. Note: The template does not display on certain pages (such as .css and .js pages), but its categorization will work.
 * Db-u1, Db-userreq

U2. Nonexistent user
This applies to user pages, user subpages, and user talk pages of users that do not exist (check Special:Listusers), except user pages for IP users who have edited, redirects from misspellings of an established user's user page, and redirects created due to a user being renamed.

Before placing one of the following templates or deleting a page under this criterion, consider whether moving the page to another location, such as a sub-page of the user page of the primary contributor, is preferable to deletion.
 * Db-u2, Db-nouser

U5. A non-contributor's misuse of Wikipedia as a web host
Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages, except for plausible drafts and pages adhering to User pages. It applies regardless of the age of the page in question.

Before placing this template or deleting a page under this criterion:
 * Read User pages and User pages.
 * Consider blanking pages with a significant history unrelated to the content that is being deleted.
 * For draft articles that are on a user's main page and which do not otherwise qualify for speedy deletion, consider moving it to a sub-page.
 * Db-u5, Db-notwebhost

Non-criteria
The following are not sufficient to justify speedy deletion:
 * 1) Reasons based on What Wikipedia is not or essays. Wikipedia is not: "a dictionary", "an indiscriminate collection of information", "a crystal ball", "a how-to list"; or essays like Listcruft, Obscure topics, Deny recognition,...; are not valid reasons for speedy deletion.
 * 2) Less-obvious hoaxes. If even remotely plausible, a suspected hoax article should be subjected to further scrutiny in a wider forum. Truth is often stranger than fiction. Note that "blatant and obvious hoaxes and misinformation" are subject to speedy deletion as vandalism.
 * 3) Original research. It is not always easy to tell whether an article consists of material that violates the policy against novel theories or interpretations or is simply unsourced.
 * 4) Notability. Articles that seem to have obviously non-notable subjects are eligible for speedy deletion only if the article does not give a credible indication of why the subject might be important or significant.
 * 5) Failure to assert importance but not an A7, A9 or A11 category. There is no consensus to speedily delete articles of types not specifically listed in A7, A9 or A11 under those criteria. Nor does it apply for neologisms that do not meet A11 because new specialized terms should have a wider hearing.
 * 6) Author deletion requests made in bad faith. Author deletion requests made in bad faith, out of frustration, after others have contributed substantially (because the work of others is involved) or in an attempt to revoke their freely-licensed contributions are not granted. However, anyone may request deletion of pages in their userspace.
 * 7) Very short articles. Short articles with sufficient content and context to qualify as stubs may not be speedily deleted under criteria A1 and A3; other criteria may still apply.
 * 8) Copies that are not copyright violations. If content appears both here and somewhere else (possibly in modified form), consider the possibility that Wikipedia's is the original version and the other site copied from Wikipedia's version. Alternatively, the same author may have written both versions, or the original may be free content.
 * 9) PNG / GIF files replaced by JPEG images. JPEG encoding discards information that may be important later. Do not delete the original PNG / GIF files.
 * 10) Questionable material that is not vandalism. Earnest efforts are never vandalism, so to assume good faith, do not delete as vandalism unless reasonably certain.
 * 11) User and user talk pages of IP addresses. Although users are encouraged to create Wikipedia accounts, unregistered users are still allowed to edit Wikipedia, and are identified by their IP addresses. If an unregistered user has a static IP address, it may have a user page and/or user talk page associated with it, and even for non-static IP addresses, the history can contain important discussions or information that may be of interest.
 * 12) An article written in a foreign language or script. An article should not be speedily deleted just because it is not written in English. Instead it should be tagged with Not English and listed at Pages needing translation into English. It may be reconsidered after translation whether the article merits deletion, retention or improvement by means of a suitable tag. However, if it already exists on another Wikimedia project, it  be speedily deletable under criterion A2.
 * 13) Subject request. Sometimes somebody claiming to be the subject of a biographical article requests deletion of the article, or even blanks the article. Article subjects do not have an automatic right to have their articles deleted. Nor does such a criterion apply to namespaces other than article space: for example, pages in the Wikipedia namespace devoted to a discussion about a particular editor. See also: Deletion policy
 * 14) Orphaned pages or redirects. A page cannot be deleted just because no other pages link to it. This includes redirects – even if 'What links here' returns nothing, a redirect may be a likely search phrase, or have links to it from outside Wikipedia.
 * 15) Redirects that are poorly targeted. A redirect should not be deleted just because its target is incorrect or confusing. Instead, change the redirect to a better target. If you're not sure where it should be targeted, open a discussion at Redirects for discussion.
 * 16) Drafts covering the same topic as an existing mainspace article. These are not valid deletions under A10 (due to not being articles) nor G6. They can be replaced with a redirect to the mainspace article if necessary.

Procedure for administrators
Make sure to specify the reason for deletion in the deletion summary. Also, in general the article's creator and major contributors should have been notified.

Before deleting a page, check the page history to assess whether it would instead be possible to revert and salvage a previous version, or there was actually a cut-and-paste move involved. Also:
 * The initial edit summary may have information about the source of or reason for the page.
 * The talk page may refer to previous deletion discussions or have ongoing discussion relevant to including the page.
 * The page log may have information about previous deletions that could warrant SALTing the page or keeping it on good reason.
 * What links here may show that the page is an oft-referred part of the encyclopedia, or may show other similar pages that warrant deletion. For pages that should not be re-created, incoming links in other pages (except in discussions, archives and tracking pages) should be removed.

If speedy deletion is inappropriate for a page:
 * 1) Please remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. Doing so will automatically remove the page from Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.
 * 2) Consider notifying the nominator, using speedy-decline or uw-csd. (If you're using CSD Helper, it will usually notify the nominator for you; it will normally use its own notification template.)

When deleting a page through the speedy deletion process, please specify the reason for deletion in the deletion summary, so that it will be recorded into the deletion log. Quoting page content in the deletion summary may be helpful, but must not be done for attack content or copyrighted text. In some cases, it would be appropriate to notify the page's creator of the deletion.

Twinkle or CSDHelper can be used to process nominations more quickly and smoothly. When processing a nomination:
 * Twinkle can delete the page.
 * Twinkle can notify the page creator if the page is deleted.
 * CSDH can delete the page, convert the nomination into a PROD nomination, or decline the nomination.
 * CSDH can notify the nominator if the nomination is converted or declined.

Obsolete criteria
In the past, criteria beginning with the following letters were used:
 * "P" for portals
 * "T" for templates and modules
 * "X" for temporary criteria to assist in large scale cleanups of problematic pages that would otherwise overwhelm the normal deletion processes.

All criteria in these groups have been obsoleted; as such, these groups are not currently in use. Some criteria in the active groups were also used in the past but are no longer valid. They are kept here for historical reference and to preserve numbering. Two of the repealed criteria did not have consensus before being enacted, and two were meant to be temporary. The remainder were merged into broader criteria or deprecated entirely. Merged with and later superseded by "No content" (A3) in November 2005 as part of a bold rewrite that was made to simplify the CSD criterion (archived discussion 1, discussion 2, discussion 3).
 * A4. Attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title

Was repealed in December 2022 (unopposed proposal) due to lack of use. Instead, use Articles for deletion. Deleted articles that are temporarily restored to allow for a transwiki can be re-deleted under "technical deletion" (G6).
 * A5. Transwikied articles

Superseded by "Attack pages" (G10) in March 2006 (discussion).
 * A6. Attack articles

Superseded by "Unambiguous copyright infringement" (G12) in October 2006 (unopposed proposal).
 * A8. Blatant copyright infringement articles

Merged into "Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page" (G8) in September 2008 (discussion).
 * R1. Redirects to non-existent pages

Repealed in March 2021 due to the problem being easily surmountable (discussion). Instead, the invalid tag should be corrected. Once the tag is corrected, other speedy deletion criteria may apply.
 * F7a. Non-free images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag

Removed in favor of proposed deletion in February 2023 following low usage and restrictions on what file types can be uploaded.
 * F10. Useless non-media files

Merged into "Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page" (G8) in October 2008 (discussion).
 * C3. Categories solely populated from a template

Enacted by Jimmy Wales without formally assessing consensus during the userbox wars. Was repealed in February 2009 (discussion). Instead, "attack pages" (G10) may be applicable in some cases; otherwise, use Miscellany for deletion for userboxes and Templates for discussion for all other templates.
 * T1. Divisive and inflammatory templates

Was repealed in July 2020 following rare, often incorrect, use (discussion). Instead, "test pages" (G2), "pure vandalism" (G3), or "technical deletion" (G6) may be applicable in some cases; otherwise, use Templates for discussion.
 * T2. Misrepresentation of policy

Was repealed in December 2020 due to misuse and the seven day hold (discussion). To delete these kinds of templates, use an existing applicable criterion or submit the template to Templates for discussion.
 * T3. Duplication and hardcoded instances

Merged into "Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page" (G8) in September 2008 (discussion).
 * T4. Subpages of non-existent pages

Was repealed in July 2021 since a bot automatically removes non-free images from user pages (discussion).
 * U3. Non-free galleries

Never enacted as policy anywhere, but deletions occurred nonetheless. Was repealed in March 2009 (discussion).
 * U4. Old IP address talk pages that meet specific criteria

Created as a G6 extension in December 2015 shortly after the discovery and arbitration case regarding 50,000+ questionable redirects created by the user Neelix, and later split into its own criterion. Was repealed in April 2018 after cleanup was completed (discussion). Instead, use Redirects for discussion.
 * X1. Redirects created by Neelix

Created to delete pages created by the content translation tool prior to 27 July 2016. Was deprecated in July 2017 when consensus agreed to move most of the remaining pages to the draft namespace (discussion).
 * X2. Pages created by the content translation tool

Repealed in February 2023 following disuse (discussion)
 * P1. Any portal that would be subject to speedy deletion as an article

Repealed in February 2023 following disuse (discussion)
 * P2. Underpopulated portal